Ad Banner Placeholder

Cambridge IGCSE Biology · 0610 · Paper 6

Paper 6 Skills: Alternative to Practical

AO3 · Experimental skills and investigations

What Paper 6 tests

Paper 6 (Alternative to Practical) is a written exam. You do not work in a lab, but you must show the same skills as Paper 5:

  • Identify independent, dependent, and control variables.
  • Complete or design results tables and graphs.
  • Make or improve biological drawings and calculate magnification.
  • Suggest errors, limitations, and improvements.
  • Write a clear, numbered method for an investigation.
  • Complete food tests, estimate populations with quadrats, and calculate rate or % change.

Theory notes explain what happens (e.g. osmosis in Chapter 3, enzymes in Chapter 5, photosynthesis in Chapter 6). This page explains how Cambridge tests investigation skills.

Independent, dependent & control variables

Independent variable (IV)
The factor you deliberately change. Only one IV in a fair test.
Dependent variable (DV)
The factor you measure. It depends on the IV.
Control variables
All other factors that could affect the result. Keep them constant.
Fair test
Only the IV changes; all control variables stay the same.
Diagram showing independent variable changed, dependent variable measured, and control variables kept constant
Diagram 1: In a fair test you change one factor (IV), measure one response (DV), and keep everything else constant.
Type Question to ask Example (amylase / starch)
Independent What am I changing? Temperature of the water bath
Dependent What am I measuring? Time for starch to be digested (or rate)
Control What must stay the same? Volumes and concentrations, pH, same enzyme batch

Exam-style scenario: Equal volumes of starch and amylase are mixed in water baths at 20°C, 30°C, 40°C, 50°C, and 60°C. Every 30 s a drop is tested with iodine until the blue-black colour disappears.

  • IV: temperature of the water bath
  • DV: time taken for starch to be digested
  • Controls: volume and concentration of starch and amylase, pH, same testing method

Tip: Values listed with different numbers (20°C, 30°C…) are usually the IV. Words like “measured”, “recorded”, or “timed” point to the DV.

Control experiments, range & repeats

A control experiment is a comparison set-up where the factor being tested is absent or at a standard level, to show the effect is genuine.

  • Photosynthesis: foil on a leaf (no light) or soda lime (no CO2) — no starch made there (Chapter 6).
  • Enzymes: boiled (denatured) enzyme with substrate — no reaction.
Range
Use at least five values of the IV, evenly spaced across a sensible range.
Repeats
Repeat each condition at least three times and calculate a mean.
Anomalies
Results that do not fit the pattern. Identify them and exclude from the mean with a reason.
Reliability
Consistent, repeatable results. Wide scatter means improve the method (e.g. thermostatic water bath).

State controls with quantities and units (e.g. 10 cm3, 30 minutes, 5 cm length), not vague “same amount”.

Results tables

A good Paper 6 table has:

  • Clear column headings with units (e.g. Salt concentration / %, Change in mass / %)
  • IV in the first column; DV (and repeats / mean) after
  • Consistent decimal places; no units in every data cell
Salt concentration / % Change in mass 1 / % Change in mass 2 / % Change in mass 3 / % Mean change in mass / %
0.0 +18.2 +17.5 +19.0 +18.2
0.5 +8.1 +7.4 +8.6 +8.0
1.0 −1.2 −0.8 −1.5 −1.2
1.5 −9.5 −10.1 −9.0 −9.5
2.0 −15.0 −14.2 −15.8 −15.0

Percentage change = (final mass − initial mass) ÷ initial mass × 100. Blot potato cylinders dry the same way before each weighing.

Graphs

  • Put the IV on the x-axis and the DV on the y-axis.
  • Label both axes with quantity and unit.
  • Choose an even scale that uses most of the grid.
  • Plot points carefully; draw a best-fit line or smooth curve — do not join points with a ruler if the trend is curved.
  • You may be asked to interpolate (read a value between points) or describe the trend.

From the sample osmosis table, 0% salt gives about +18% mass (water enters) and 2.0% salt about −15% (water leaves). The concentration where mean change is zero is the point matching the cells’ water potential — read it from the graph, do not guess.

Graph of percentage change in mass against salt concentration with a best-fit curve
Diagram 2: Sample osmosis graph — axes with units, plotted means, and a smooth best-fit curve.

Exam Traps

  • Axes without units lose marks even when the shape of the graph is correct.
  • Do not force a straight line through curved osmosis or enzyme data.

Biological drawings & magnification

Paper 6 often asks you to draw a specimen or photomicrograph:

  • Use a sharp, continuous outline — no sketchy lines.
  • No shading or colouring in.
  • Label with ruled horizontal lines that touch the structure; labels clear and outside the drawing.
  • State magnification or include a scale bar if asked.
Correct biological drawing with ruled labels compared with a shaded sketch that loses marks
Diagram 3: Clear outline and ruled labels earn marks; shading and vague labels do not.

To find actual size from a photomicrograph: measure the image size (mm), convert to µm if needed (× 1000), then rearrange magnification. Full formula practice: Chapter 2.

Measuring image size across a cell on a photomicrograph and rearranging the magnification formula
Diagram 4: Measure image size carefully, keep units consistent, then rearrange M = image ÷ actual.

Observations and food tests

Paper 6 often asks you to record colours or complete a results table. State the reagent, the condition (e.g. heat), and the positive colour. Full chemistry of the tests: Chapter 4.

Test for Method (exam wording) Positive result
Starch Add iodine solution Blue-black
Reducing sugar Add Benedict’s solution; heat Green / yellow / brick-red (depending on amount)
Protein Add biuret reagent Purple / lilac
Fat / lipid Ethanol, then water (emulsion test) Cloudy white emulsion

A negative result is the original reagent colour (e.g. iodine stays brown-orange; Benedict’s stays blue). Do not invent a new colour.

Sampling with quadrats

To estimate how many plants grow in an area, you cannot count every individual. Use a quadrat (usually 0.25 m2 or 1 m2).

  • Random sampling: use random coordinates (or throw with eyes closed only if the question allows). Avoid choosing “typical-looking” patches — that is biased.
  • Count the organisms (or % cover) in each quadrat.
  • Calculate a mean per quadrat, then scale up: estimated number = mean × (total area ÷ quadrat area).
  • More quadrats improve reliability.
Field divided into a grid with three randomly placed quadrats used to estimate plant numbers
Diagram 5: Place several quadrats at random, find a mean count, then scale up to the whole area.

Worked numbers: Mean of 6 plants per 0.25 m2 quadrat. Field is 50 m2. Number of quadrats that would fill the field = 50 ÷ 0.25 = 200. Estimate = 6 × 200 = 1200 plants.

Calculations, trends and conclusions

Typical Paper 6 calculations:

  • Mean = sum of repeats ÷ number of repeats (exclude a named anomaly).
  • Percentage change = (change ÷ original) × 100. Include the sign if mass is lost.
  • Rate when you time a colour change or the disappearance of starch: rate = 1 / time. A shorter time is a faster rate.
Comparison showing that a reaction finishing in 20 seconds has a higher rate than one finishing in 80 seconds
Diagram 6: Rate = 1 / time. Do not treat a long time as a high rate.

Worked % change: Potato mass 8.0 g to 7.2 g. Change = −0.8 g. Percentage change = (−0.8 ÷ 8.0) × 100 = −10%.

When you describe a graph, say what happens to the DV as the IV increases, mention any peak or plateau, and use the data (with units). A conclusion links the pattern to the biology (e.g. “enzyme activity is highest at 40°C; above this the enzyme is denatured”) without inventing results that are not on the graph.

Errors, accuracy & improvements

Accuracy
How close a result is to the true value (better apparatus, careful technique).
Precision / reliability
How close repeats are to each other (more repeats, tighter method).

When asked for a source of error or improvement, be specific:

  • Uneven blotting of potato → blot with the same number of tissues / same pressure.
  • Temperature of water bath drifts → use a thermostatically controlled bath.
  • Human reaction time with a stopwatch → use a data logger / light gate if appropriate, or time a larger change.
  • Only two concentrations tested → use at least five values of the IV.

Do not write only “human error” — say what went wrong and how to fix it.

Investigation Typical limitation Improvement
Osmosis (potato) Surface water left on cylinders Blot the same way; use % change in mass
Enzymes Water bath temperature not constant Thermostatic bath; equilibrate tubes first
Photosynthesis (bubbles) Bubbles vary in size Collect gas in a syringe / measure volume
Transpiration Air leak in potometer tubing Check joints under water; cut stem under water

Writing a method

  1. Aim — one sentence stating what you investigate.
  2. Variables — IV, DV, and at least two controls with quantities.
  3. Equipment — list apparatus with sizes where relevant.
  4. Method — numbered steps; imperative verbs (Measure, Cut, Record, Repeat).
  5. Safety — relevant hazards (iodine stain, cork borer, hot water).
  6. Results table — headings and units ready.
  7. Graph — state axes (IV on x, DV on y).

Do not put results or a conclusion inside the method.

Full worked example — osmosis in potato

Plan an investigation to find how salt concentration affects osmosis in potato tissue.

Independent variable
Concentration of salt solution (0%, 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, 2.0%).
Dependent variable
Percentage change in mass of potato cylinders.
Control variables
  • Same type of potato; cylinders cut to the same length and diameter
  • Same volume of solution (e.g. 20 cm3) in each tube
  • Same soaking time (e.g. 30 minutes)
  • Same temperature; same blotting method before reweighing
Outline method
  1. Cut five potato cylinders to 4 cm using a cork borer.
  2. Prepare salt solutions of 0%, 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, and 2.0%.
  3. Weigh each cylinder and record the initial mass.
  4. Place one cylinder in each solution for 30 minutes.
  5. Remove, blot dry gently, reweigh, and calculate percentage change in mass.
  6. Repeat the whole experiment three times and calculate means.
  7. Plot mean % change in mass (y) against salt concentration (x).

Theory behind the mass changes: Chapter 3 · Diffusion and osmosis.

Second worked example — temperature and amylase

Plan an investigation to find how temperature affects the activity of amylase on starch.

Independent variable
Temperature (20°C, 30°C, 40°C, 50°C, 60°C) using a water bath.
Dependent variable
Time for the mixture to stop giving a blue-black colour with iodine / s; then rate = 1 / time.
Control variables
Equal volumes of starch and amylase (e.g. 5 cm3 of each); same concentrations; same pH (buffer if available); same drop size of iodine; same testing interval (e.g. every 30 s).
Outline method
  1. Equilibrate separate tubes of starch and amylase in a 20°C water bath for 5 minutes.
  2. Mix, start a stopwatch, and test a drop with iodine every 30 s until it stays orange-brown.
  3. Record the time. Repeat at each temperature with fresh solutions.
  4. Repeat the whole set three times; calculate mean times and rates.
  5. Plot rate (y) against temperature (x). Expect a peak near the enzyme’s optimum.
Safety
Iodine stains skin and clothes; hot water baths can scald. Wear goggles; wipe spills.

Enzyme theory: Chapter 5.

0/8

Ad Banner Placeholder